Jump to content

Treatment protocol


Summer

Recommended Posts

Dear OncoDoc, Teresa, John:

I find myself terribly confused as to the way my partner's treatment is progressing. He experienced severe stomach pain and bone kind of pain in the neck/shoulder 2 weeks after the second chemo (CAV). Doc suspected constipation side effects of Vincristine, but laxatives and subsequent bowel relief did not ease the pain. 3rd chemo was yesterday (back to Carbo/VP-16) and Doc now thinks pain may be due to liver involvement. X-ray showed progression of disease in chest. Doc agreed to doing a CT scan, but doesn't think there's much point in doing PET or MRI. He prescribed the duragesic patch, oxycodone and a sleeping pill, and the pain is greatly relieved.

Still I'm left with some questions that haven't been answered - and am hoping you might have some input:

1) Is stomach pain/bone pain not also a side effect of Vincristine? The drug information sheet tells me so. And, isn't Topotecan a better alternative to CAV, with less side effects and better symptom relief? Doc says he probably won't use CAV next time but did not tell us of a specific alternative drug, only that there are about 100 out there.

2) Initially Doc had reported what he thought was a slight improvement on chest x-ray after the 1st chemo (hard to tell, they had misplaced the earlier x-ray so no way to compare), yet the latest film shows progression of disease. Would it make sense to go on to a different drug now, rather than continue with the current regimen?

3) Considering the lack of response to these chemo drugs, could it be that this is mixed cell lung cancer? I understand different drugs would be used then. Biopsy had been done on a lymph node under the clavicle.

4) Last WBR treatment was 10/19. When would a follow-up MRI be indicated?

I probably need to work on being more assertive and getting my questions answered at the doctor's office. I understand that the prognosis is poor but we still want to fight. Doc doesn't talk much and is not very forthcoming when we ask questions :( I probably need to work on being more assertive in getting answers.

Any input you might have is much appreciated.

Summer

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Summer,

I'm not the one to answer your questions about specific drugs and their side effects and usage, but I might be able to help you in communicating with the doc.

First, always write down the 2- 3 questions that are most important BEFORE going to the office visit. You may not have time to get 5 or 10 questions answered, but every doc should take a few minutes to answer 2 or 3. If you have them written down, you cannot forget them! And no one will think less of you for it; believe me. I forget what to ask when I'm in the examining room myself. It is a completely human and normal response to forget the important stuff during an office visit.

Another strategy is to write down your questions and HAND them to the doc as he enters the room. I'd suggest that you do not give them to the person (usually a medical assistant) who shows you into the room; they may or may not get into the doc's hands that way. Try to be brief and succinct. No one can answer what the future will hold, but any decent doc will answer why the current treatment was chosen and what the next steps will be. These are basics; you deserve this much.

Good luck to you! And keep fighting the good fight, Teresa

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Summer, I'll try to address those one at a time.

1) Stomach/bone pain is not a common side effect of cytoxan, vincristine or adriamycin but can happen. I agree with your partner's doctor that when someone is having abdominal pain on that treatment regimen, I usually worry about neuropathic changes of the small intestine causing constipation and pain. Any chemotherapy can result in bone pain due to the recovering bone marrow after the blood counts drop but that usually happens in the second week, not right away. I agree that topotecan is probably a more tolerable drug and in fact a randomized study comparing them head-to-head showed less toxicity with at least as good of outcomes with topo.

2) Hard to say without knowing more detail about the xrays. In principle, I do agree that sticking with a chemo regimen if the cancer is showing definite signs of progression would not be my choice with an aggressive cancer like small cell.

3) It's possible. There are often components of NSCLC that coexist with small cell. If the cancer appears to be acting aggressively or if the sodium level in the blood is low, it is very likely that this is still small cell. If it seems to be growing more slowly then NSCLC would be possible. There are some drugs that are effective for both (taxol for example).

4) Small cell is so radiosensitive that I usually wait about 3 months to get a follow-up MRI. This gives the radiation enough time to "do its thing".

I know this is a hard situation and there is more than one "right answer" when choosing treatments.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dr. Joe,

You mention low blood sodium as a sign of small cell, why?

Thanks,

Jen

I had that too -- sodium was 119 when I was hospitalized -- should have been closer to 140 (which it was by the time I left the hospital). It was accompanied by fluid retention in both feet/ankles. I also had the right lower lobe pneumonia (where the initial tumor was), but none of the typical pneumonia symptoms (no fever, not much coughing). The Pulmonologist said that was what clued him in to me probably having SCLC. I was curious too if low sodium was one of the SCLC symptoms??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Small cell lung cancer arises from hormone producing cells in the lung. They often continue to produce hormones after they become cancerous. One of the most common is a hormone called antidiuretic hormone (ADH) which when produced in excess results in the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone production (SIADH). This results in the body retaining too much "free water" which dilutes the sodium in your blood causing hyponatremia (low sodium). The trick is that the sodium is not really low, there is just too much water in your body making it look low due to dilution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the answer. Does that mean NSCLC does not arise from hormone producing cells like SCLC? And if I can be really a pain, how does smoking w/ SCLC relate to the hormone prodcuing cells.

In my story, I had horrible and bizzare hormone symtoms for a year prior to dx. Severe flushing, spiking blood pressure (200/110), then a few hours later it would be normal, dark pigment changes on my face, a rash on my face, rapid heart beat on and off. Got tx for everything but LC. One ER Doc got close, he suspected an adrenal Pheo (sp) and did an MRI- negative. I later researched this after LC dx and found that they also grow in the bronchials and that should have been a next step. Carcinoid tumors- is that sclc?

As you can see, I m still confussed about how this cancer, sclc actually starts and how it is different from how nsclc starts. I have a feeling I am not alone. I know smoking is involved, but how does it make it happen and why are ther fewer people w/ sclc?

You probably want to smack me for all of these questions :)

Thanks,

Jen

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One of the most common is a hormone called antidiuretic hormone (ADH) which when produced in excess results in the syndrome of inappropriate antidiuretic hormone production (SIADH). This results in the body retaining too much "free water" which dilutes the sodium in your blood causing hyponatremia (low sodium). The trick is that the sodium is not really low, there is just too much water in your body making it look low due to dilution.

That's exactly what was on my discharge summary from the hospital -- one of the secondary diagnoses was SIADH. Thanks so much, Dr. Joe. It makes more sense to me now-- also why my fluid intake was restricted for a while until my sodium level came back up.

Di

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Jen, you describe symptoms of hyperaldosteronism, which means excess hormone produced by the adrenal glands. So the ER doc was on the right track. SCLC is called a neuroendocrine tumor, i.e., hormone-producing, and it does usually arise in the bronchi, or the larger airways. These cancers can produce many hormone-like substances that play with electrolytes such as calcium, drop blood sugar levels through insulin-like hormones, and play a whole host of other nasty tricks.

Carcinoid tumors are neither small-cell or non-small cell. They are neuroendocrine tumors, like SCLC. You might find this ACS site useful:

http://www.cancer.org/docroot/CRI/content/CRI_2_4_1X_What_is_lung_carcinoid_tumor_56.asp?sitearea=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That is so interesting. Six months prior to my mom's diagnosis her thyroid medicine (Synthroid) was giving her trouble. The dosage was all wrong suddenly after 20 years. Her Endo doc, who is excellent, ran lots of tests, including checking her adrenal function which was normal and ended up adjusting the dosage. She also developed a sudden orthostatic condition and was treated for that. The endo doc was ordering an MRI of her neck and chest, however her tumor was found prior on a routine xray for surgery clearance. Wow, I wish I had known about all this. Thanks for sharing all this info.

Nancy

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.