Jump to content

Five-Gene Signature Linked to Survival in NSCLC


RandyW

Recommended Posts

Five-Gene Signature Linked to Survival in NSCLC

By Judith Groch, Senior Writer, MedPage Today

Reviewed by Zalman S. Agus, MD; Emeritus Professor at the University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine.

January 03, 2007

Additional Lung Cancer Coverage

High-power view of STAT1

TAIPEI, Taiwan, Jan. 3 -- Relapse-free and overall survival for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) can be predicted by a molecular signature with five specific genes, researchers here reported.

The current staging system for non-small-cell lung cancer is inadequate for predicting treatment outcomes, whereas molecular methods appear valuable in estimating prognosis and in determining therapy, Pan-Chyr Yang, M.D., Ph.D., of the National Taiwan University Hospital, and colleagues, wrote in the Jan. 4 issue of the New England Journal of Medicine. Action Points

When talking to interested patients, advise them that the genetic profile for lung cancer tumors described here is investigational and its value in clinical practice is still uncertain.

In a gene profiling study, the researchers used computer-generated random numbers to assign 185 frozen specimens for microarray analysis, real-time reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) analysis, or both.

Next, they studied gene expression in frozen specimens of lung cancer tissue from 125 randomly selected patients who had undergone surgical resection for non-small-cell lung cancer between 1999 and 2003. The specimens were evaluated for the level of expression and for survival.

The specimens represented a mixture of tumor types and stages. Of the 125 specimens, 60 were adenocarcinomas, 52 were squamous-cell carcinomas, and 13 were other types.

Of an original 672 genes associated with invasive activity, the researchers identified 16 that correlated with increased survival (four) or decreased (12). From this, they developed a score that discriminated between high and low risk of death or recurrence.

To develop a gene-expression model to predict treatment outcome, they selected five genes for RT-PCR and decision-tree analysis. They found that the presence of the five-gene signature was an independent predictor of relapse-free and overall survival.

The median follow-up of the 101 patients was 20 months. The patients with a high-risk gene signature had a shorter median overall survival than the patients with a low-risk gene signature (20 months vs. 40 months, P<0.001. The high-risk gene signature was associated with a median relapse-free survival of 13 months, whereas the low-risk gene signature was associated with a median relapse-free survival of 29 months (P=0.002 by).

The five genes were DUSP6, MMD, STAT1, ERBB3, and LCK.

For validation of the five-gene model, the researchers used randomly assigned specimens from an independent cohort of 60 NSCLC patients treated at the Veterans General Hospital in Taichung, Taiwan, and a set of published microarray data from 86 lung cancer patients from a Western population.

The five signature genes, the researchers said, may offer targets for the development of lung cancer therapy. In a review of the genes, the researchers wrote:

STAT1 causes arrested growth and apoptosis in many types of cancer cells by inducing the expression of p21WAF1 and caspase.

MMD is preferentially expressed in mature macrophages. Macrophage activation promotes cancer metastasis, although the function of the MMD protein is unknown.

DUSP6 inactivates extracellular signal-regulated kinase 2 (ERK2) (also known as mitogen-activated protein kinase 1 [MAPK1]), resulting in tumor suppression and apoptosis.

ERBB3, a member of the epidermal growth factor receptor family of tyrosine kinases, can shorten cell survival.

LCK, a member of the Src family of protein tyrosine kinases, is expressed mainly in T cells and is one of the first signaling molecules downstream of the T-cell receptor. It plays a key role not only in the differentiation and activation of T cells but also in the induction of apoptosis. In addition, LCK is expressed in many cancers and regulates the mobility of cancer cells.

NSCLC is a heterogeneous disease. Even in patients with similar clinical and pathological features, the outcome varies. Few are cured, whereas in others the cancer recurs, Dr. Yang's team wrote. "Staging systems for lung cancer that are based on clinical and pathological findings may have reached their limit of usefulness for predicting outcomes, but molecular methods add value," they said.

The five-gene signature has clinical implications. As an example, they cited the use of Platinol (cisplatin)-based adjuvant chemotherapy, which is effective in some of these patients. Patients with a high-risk gene signature could benefit from this type of therapy, whereas those with a low-risk gene signature might be spared what may be unnecessary treatment, they said.

In conclusion, they wrote that the five-gene expression signature, which is closely associated with the clinical outcome in NSCLC, "could be useful is stratifying patients according to risk in trials of adjuvant treatment of the disease."

In an accompanying editorial, Roy Herbst, M.D., Ph.D., and Scott Lippman, M.D., both of the University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center in Houston, took the long view, commenting on the study but also outlining the future of molecular profiling.

The study by Dr. Yang and colleagues produced "robust, promising results," they wrote, but it also raised several questions.

Given that tumors are heterogeneous and that the biopsy specimens were not microdissected, the analysis could have underestimated or overestimated the importance of invasion-related genes, which can vary in expression throughout a tumor. Molecular epidemiologic, stromal, and vascular factors are critical to the metastatic process, and these elements were not specifically analyzed in this study.

Furthermore, they said, the statistical design can also influence the selection of a signature, and the choice of the cutoff expression levels surely influenced how the original 672 genes were selected. The relationship of the signature genes to metastasis may be "contributory or possibly only associative, and for this reason, proteomics will probably be useful in evaluating this question of cause and effect," they wrote.

This report reflects the maturation of the first phase of lung-cancer genomics, which has been based on stored tissue and clinical charts. "The field is now poised to begin its next phase," they said. Needed are prospective trials of adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early lung cancer who are selected because they have a high risk of relapse or metastasis according to the molecular signature identified in this study or by others.

Looking to the future, the editorial writers suggested that cancer genomics will expand in two areas: molecular profiles associated with response or resistance to particular standard or novel therapies, and clinical trials based on molecular profiles that indicate a benefit from new or standard agents.

This new phase of target profiling and agent-specific profiling will probably require an algorithm that would include genomic, proteomic, clinical, and imaging factors, they said.

"The profiles, we predict, will be used for the development of novel drugs. Patients with early-stage cancers will be assigned to particular drugs on the basis of the molecular characteristics of the tumors. Then the development of drugs for the treatment of lung cancer will be focused on personalized therapy," they concluded.

Harn-Jing Terng, Ph.D., of the Taiwan group reported being an employee of Advpharma, Tapei Hsien, Taiwan, which also provided grant support for this study.

Additional Lung Cancer Coverage

Earn CME/CE credit for reading the news.

Primary source: New England Journal of Medicine

Source reference:

Chen, H-Y, et al "A Five-Gene Signature and Clinical Outcome in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer" N Eng J Med 2007; 356 (1):11-20.

Additional source: New England Journal of Medicine

Source reference:

Herbst, RS, Lippman, SM, "Molecular Signatures of Lung Cancer -- Toward Personalized Therapy" N Eng J Med 2007; 356 (1): 76-78.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Disclaimer

top

Earn CME/CE credit for reading the news.

Sign up now to receive the Daily Headlines email:

Email address:

Privacy | Terms of use

Daily Podcasts: News and views on NSCLC from ASCO 2006 (more...)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

EGFR Inhibitor Improves Survival in Advanced NSCLC (more...)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Privacy | Terms of use | Sitemap | Contact us

© 2004-7 MedPage Today, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.