Barb73 Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/165229.php ARTICLE: . . . . . . . . . A nanomedicine research group led by a University of Toronto chemist has received a $5-million grant from the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC), giving them the green light to develop faster ways of detecting leukemia and lung cancer cells. "This funding will lead to healthier lives for Canadians," says Gilbert Walker, a professor in U of T's Department of Chemistry and primary investigator of the Network for Bioplasmonic Systems (BiopSys). "Our first goal is to determine the presence of lung cancer at an earlier stage than is currently possible, which will permit faster screening. Our second goal is to develop similar devices for detecting leukemia that will greatly decrease the time needed for diagnosis." The BiopSys network aims to speed up cancer diagnosis by incorporating an emerging technology known as plasmonics into existing procedures that use cancer markers found on the surfaces of cells. Plasmonics - a technique that produces waves of electrons when light hits a metal surface - offers significant opportunities for increasing the number of types of cancer markers that can be identified simultaneously. "Bioplasmonics uses light illumination and engineers it for the extremely sensitive detection of biological molecules," says Walker. "BiopSys will develop technologies that allow for more selective detection of diseases and other health conditions that are evident on cell surfaces." The BiopSys network is one of two U of T projects to receive a $5-million funding boost through NSERC's Strategic Research Networks program, announced today at McMaster University. The other - led by computer scientist Renée Miller, Bell Canada Chair of Information Systems at U of T - looks at developing better information management systems for business, scientific, and government organizations. "We are delighted that two of the nine networks created today are based at U of T," says Professor Paul Young, U of T's vice-president (research). "These grants fund large-scale multi-disciplinary projects that have the potential to bring great benefit to society in the coming years, and this is exactly the kind of work that Professor Walker is leading. We will look to him and others like him who are working closely with collaborators in academia and industry for innovations that will improve the nation's economy and the quality of life of its citizens." The network, which will receive NSERC funding of $1 million per year for five years, is unique in that it brings together experts from a wide range of disciplines and skill sets. U of T researchers in the Departments of Chemistry, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Physics and the Faculty of Medicine are involved, as well as scientists from the Universities of Ottawa, Victoria, Western Ontario and Windsor. The team also includes scientists from the École Polytechnique de Montréal and Toronto's Mt. Sinai and Princess Margaret Hospitals as well as industrial partners. "We are extremely grateful to NSERC for its continued investment in excellence and for its support of U of T research," says University of Toronto president David Naylor. "The BiopSys network represents a unique partnership between universities, industry and government that will lead to revolutionary improvements in cancer diagnosis. The network brings together some of the best minds from a wide range of disciplines, including biochemistry, engineering and physics. Through its industrial partners, BiopSys will be able to transfer that knowledge into practice quickly, developing equipment of significant value to Canadians." NSERC's Strategic Network grants aim to increase research and training in areas that could enhance Canada's economy, society and/or environment in the next decade. . . . . . . . . . (Medical News Today, Main Category: Leukemia; Myeloma; Included: Lung Cancer; Biology/Biochemistry; Medical Devices/Diagnostics. Source: Sean Bettam, University of Toronto, September 26, 2009) Disclaimer: The information contained in these articles may or may not be in agreement with my own opinions. They are not being posted with the intention of being medical advice of any kind. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaminkw Posted September 27, 2009 Share Posted September 27, 2009 Barbara, I'm so glad to see this effort getting funded. I will probably always be angry because I did all the right things for years before I was dx'd. I'd started eating better and exercising regularly. I got complete annual checkups including chest x-ray, bone density tests, ekgs and a full battery of blood work. The doctors were amazed to see my seemingly perfectt chest x-ray in June compared to the complete white-out of the left lung in Sep of the same year. Until they come up with better ways of early detection, many of us will continue to have "advanced" lung cancer as our first dx. Judy in Key West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barb73 Posted September 27, 2009 Author Share Posted September 27, 2009 Yes, Judy, you are right on with that analysis. Until they stop fooling around, thinking that X-rays are the be all, end all, things won't move forward. When a person has a constant cough, go the distance to a CT Scan, please. Bill's late diagnosis was the result of a pulmonologist thinking that a former NY firefighter for 22 years (and we know all the compounds they experience, and a former smoker (with a constant, dry cough) could do with just two digital X-rays that seemed OK. Then, he sent him looking for acid reflux. What a sham. What a tragic joke. This is why I advocate. I am so damned angry that people are most likely still being treated this way in many areas of this land. Our second pulmonologist told us that if he had seen Bill first - the story would have been different. I know it would have been different. A year is a long time for cancer cells to do their damage. I pray and hope that public awareness will finally realize that keeping to the "old ways" is no longer acceptable. Ignorance is not acceptable, and stigma is no longer a viable excuse for lack of funding. Who cares where the disease emanates? It doesn't matter a hill of beans if we are a compassionate people. Besides, we are not so smart that we actually know 100% just where someone's lung cancer was derived. May Canada be successful in what we apparently also need to do. We need more improved methods to kick this disease in the royal butt. Stepping down from my soapbox, but no guarantee that I won't be ascending to it again. Barbara Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaminkw Posted September 28, 2009 Share Posted September 28, 2009 Barbara, you on your soapbox or otherwise are always a welcome read. We need people who keep talking about it. Judy in Key West Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.