Hello - I hope it is ok to be here as I don't have a diagnosis yet. I have a 32mm mass in my lower left lobe that has been persistent over 3 months. It was mildly avid on the PET scan with no other findings. I'm a 42 year old never smoker, female. It was a shock at first to find out that it is there, but now I am a bit used to it. However, from what I have been reading, it you have ruled out infection and inflammation (which we have), it's likely going to turn into cancer if it's not already, even it's slow growing. I might be wrong about that, but I really want to have surgery to get it out rather than watch and wait for the next 40-50 years. Doc did do a bronchoscopy, but he wasn't able to do a biopsy because there were blood vessels in the way, making it high risk. Everything was normal leading up to and around the mass, however.
I'm not getting a lot of information from my Dr, unfortunately. I'd like to know why a CT-guided needle biopsy isn't an option, for example, or why they can't test my blood for EFGR just to see. I even went to another guy to ask my many questions, and he was worse, just like, "well, we don't know what it is..."
I wrote in using MyChart to ask if I was eligible for surgery, and the answer was "well, we usually just monitor these, but sure, we'll refer you to surgery." I'm baffled. I'm not in a small town, but I'm wondering if I should seek a clinic elsewhere. I did find a clinical trial in Texas that focuses on suspicious nodules and treats with Keytruda, so I'm considering that because I'm not that interested in waiting for a mass in my lung to act like cancer before we do anything.
I'd appreciate some perspective. Am I over-reacting or having incorrect expectations of my doctor? I know it might be a hamartoma, but it seems like those often have to be removed too, so I might as well go for it while I'm still young-ish and in good health.