Jump to content

RFA Effective for Lung Tumors/Primary or Mets to Lung


Barb73

Recommended Posts

http://patient.cancerconsultants.com/Ca ... ,treatment

ARTICLE:

. . . . . . . . .

The use of radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of lung cancer, or pulmonary metastases (cancer that has spread from site of origin to the lung) provides an effective and safe therapeutic option for some patients. These results were recently published in the Lancet Oncology.

Lung cancer is responsible for more deaths related to cancer than the next three most deadly cancers combined. If cancer originates in the lung, it is referred to as primary lung cancer. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung cancer, and refers to the type of cell within the lung from which the cancer originated.

Lung metastasis refers to cancer that has spread to the lung from other sites in the body. Lung metastases are common among patients diagnosed with advanced breast cancer, colon cancer, melanoma, prostate cancer or other solid tumors.

Treatment for primary lung cancer or lung metastases often consists of the surgical removal of the cancer, radiation therapy, targeted therapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. The type of therapy used is largely dependent upon the individual patient and characteristics of the disease. Since treatment is often not well-tolerated, researchers continue to evaluate ways in which to improve outcomes for patients with either primary or metastatic lung tumors.

Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) is commonly used for the treatment of tumors in the liver that are not amenable to surgery. The procedure involves the use of a small probe that is inserted into the site of cancer. The physician guides the probe through scans so that the treatment can be contained to the site of cancer, and so that limited surrounding tissue is affected. Radio waves flow through the probe to the site of cancer, thereby destroying the cells. RFA typically requires local anesthesia, no surgery, and affects only the site of cancer without causing side effects to the rest of the body. RFA is currently being evaluated in lung tumors as well as other tumors affecting different parts of the body.

Researchers from Europe, the United States and Australia recently conducted a clinical trial, referred to as the RAPTURE study, to further evaluate the use of RFA in lung tumors among 106 patients. Patients had either NSCLC or lung metastases, with the site of cancer within the lung measuring 3.5 centimeters in diameter or smaller. All patients were considered unsuitable for treatment with chemotherapy or radiation therapy. Patients underwent RFA and were followed for two years.

Completion of therapy was achieved in 99 percent of patients; correct placement of the probe was not achievable in one small tumor.

There were no treatment-related deaths

88 percent of patients achieved a complete disappearance of cancer at the site of RFA lasting for at least one year

Overall survival at one year was 70 percent, 89 percent, and 92 percent, respectively for patients with NSCLC, patients with lung metastases from colorectal cancer, and those with metastases from other sites.

Overall survival at two years was 48 percent, 66 percent and 64 percent, respectively for patients with NSCLC, those with lung metastases from colorectal cancer, and those with metastases from other sites.

Only 8 percent of patients diagnosed with Stage I NSCLC (stage at which the cancer has not spread outside the lung) died from their cancer at two years.

The researchers concluded that RFA appears to be a promising therapeutic approach for patients with either primary or metastatic lung cancers who are not suitable candidates for other treatment alternatives. The authors stated that “Randomised controlled trials comparing radiofrequency ablation with standard non-surgical treatment options are warranted.” Patients with lung tumors who are not candidates for standard therapeutic approaches may wish to speak with their physician regarding their individual risks and benefits of participating in a clinical trial further evaluating RFA or other standard therapeutic approaches. Two sources of information regarding ongoing clinical trials include the National Cancer Institute (cancer.gov) and eCancerTrials.com.

. . . . . . . . .

(Cancer Consultants, Oncology Resource Center, July 16, 2008)

Disclaimer:

The information contained in these articles may or may not be in agreement with my own opinions. They are not posted as medical advice of any kind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.